Wrike vs Asana: Which Project Management Tool is Better in 2025?
Affiliate Disclosure: This post contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no additional cost to you when you sign up through our links. All opinions are based on hands-on testing.
Quick Verdict
| Criteria | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Best Overall | Asana | Better balance of power and usability |
| Best for Enterprises | Wrike | Advanced resource management and reporting |
| Easiest to Use | Asana | Cleaner interface, faster onboarding |
| Best for Mid-Size Teams | Asana | Perfect for 10-100 person companies |
| Best for Resource Planning | Wrike | Superior workload and capacity management |
Quick Comparison Table
| Feature | Wrike | Asana |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $9.80/user/month (2-user min) | $10.99/user/month |
| Free Plan | Up to 5 users | Up to 15 users |
| Resource Management | ✅ Advanced workload views | ⚠️ Basic workload (Advanced plan) |
| Cross-Project Reporting | ✅ Excellent | ✅ Good (Portfolios) |
| Time Tracking | ✅ Built-in native | ⚠️ Via integrations |
| Gantt Charts | ✅ Advanced | ✅ Timeline view |
| Custom Workflows | ✅ Extensive | ✅ Good |
| Learning Curve | 2-3 weeks | 1-2 weeks |
| Overall Rating | 4.3/5 | 4.5/5 |
| Try It | Try Wrike → | Try Asana → |
Executive Summary
After 70+ hours testing Wrike and Asana with enterprise teams and mid-sized companies, we found both are powerful project management platforms targeting different audiences. Wrike is built for large enterprises needing advanced resource management, cross-project reporting, and detailed workload planning. Asanabalances power with usability, making it ideal for growing teams (10-100 people) who want robust features without overwhelming complexity.
Key Takeaways:
- 🏢 Wrike wins for enterprises - advanced resource management and workload balancing
- 👥 Asana wins for mid-sized teams - better UX and faster adoption
- 📊 Wrike offers superior cross-project reporting and analytics
- ⚡ Asana has faster learning curve - 1-2 weeks vs 2-3 weeks for Wrike
- 💰 Similar pricing for comparable plans - both around $10-25/user/month
If you're an enterprise (200+ people) with complex resource planning needs, choose Wrike. If you're a growing company (10-100 people) wanting powerful project management without enterprise complexity,choose Asana. Both excel at different scales.
Wrike Overview
What is Wrike?
Wrike is an enterprise-grade project management platform used by over 20,000 companies including Estee Lauder, Hootsuite, and Siemens. Founded in 2006, Wrike has evolved into a comprehensive work management solution with strengths in resource management, portfolio reporting, and cross-functional team collaboration.
Wrike's power lies in its depth. The platform offers advanced features like workload management, cross-project dashboards, request forms, proofing workflows, and custom item types. It's designed for PMO leaders, agency owners, and enterprise teams managing hundreds of concurrent projects across departments.
Key Features
1. Advanced Resource Management
Wrike's Workload view shows team capacity and utilization across all projects. See who's overloaded, who has capacity, and balance workloads with drag-and-drop. Set hourly capacities per person and track actual vs estimated time. Essential for agencies billing by the hour.
Our rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (5/5)
Why it matters: Best-in-class resource management. Agencies and professional services firms need this level of workload visibility. Asana's workload features are more basic.
2. Cross-Project Dashboards
Create custom dashboards pulling data from multiple projects, folders, and spaces. Track KPIs, project health, team performance, and budget utilization in one view. Perfect for executives needing organizational visibility.
Our rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (5/5)
Why it matters: Enterprise teams managing 50+ projects need this visibility. Wrike's dashboards are more powerful than Asana's Portfolio views.
3. Built-in Proofing & Approval
Review and approve creative work directly in Wrike. Annotate images, videos, and documents with comments. Track approval stages and maintain version history. Eliminates need for separate proofing tools like Filestage.
Our rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (5/5)
Why it matters: Critical for marketing teams and agencies. Asana requires third-party integrations for comparable proofing workflows.
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 |
|
| Professional | $9.80/user/month |
|
| Business | $24.80/user/month |
|
| Enterprise | Contact sales |
|
Asana Overview
What is Asana?
Asana, founded by Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz, serves over 130,000 paying customers including Uber, NASA, and Pinterest. Asana balances powerful project management capabilities with an approachable interface that teams actually enjoy using. It's the go-to choice for mid-sized companies (10-100 people) needing to scale beyond simple tools like Trello.
Asana's sweet spot is teams that need multiple views (List, Board, Timeline, Calendar), dependencies, portfolios, and automation - but don't need enterprise complexity. The platform is more intuitive than Wrike, with faster onboarding and higher team adoption rates.
Key Features
1. Multiple Project Views
Switch between List, Board (Kanban), Timeline (Gantt), and Calendar views instantly. Each view shows the same data in different formats. Developers love Board view, executives prefer Timeline, coordinators use List view. No configuration needed - all views work out of the box.
Our rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (5/5)
Why it matters: View flexibility without complexity. Wrike has similar views but requires more setup. Asana's views just work.
2. Portfolios for Project Oversight
Monitor multiple projects simultaneously with Portfolios. See all projects' status, progress, and health in one view. Set custom statuses (On Track, At Risk, Off Track) with status updates. Perfect for PMO leaders and department heads.
Our rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (4/5)
Why it matters: Essential for managing 10+ concurrent projects. Wrike's dashboards are more customizable, but Asana's Portfolios are simpler and faster to set up.
3. Rules-Based Automation
Create custom automation rules: "When task moves to Done, complete all subtasks and notify manager." Build multi-step workflows without coding. Rules work across all views and update in real-time.
Our rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (5/5)
Why it matters: Saves hours weekly on repetitive work. Both Asana and Wrike offer powerful automation - this category is a tie.
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Personal | Free |
|
| Starter | $10.99/user/month |
|
| Advanced | $24.99/user/month |
|
Detailed Feature Comparison
| Feature | Wrike | Asana |
|---|---|---|
| Resource Management | ✅ Advanced workload charts | ⚠️ Basic (Advanced plan) |
| Time Tracking | ✅ Built-in native | ⚠️ Via Harvest integration |
| Gantt Charts | ✅ Advanced | ✅ Timeline view |
| Custom Dashboards | ✅ Highly customizable | ✅ Portfolios |
| Proofing & Approval | ✅ Built-in | ⚠️ Via integrations |
| Request Forms | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Dependencies | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Mobile App Quality | ✅ Good (4.4/5) | ✅ Excellent (4.7/5) |
| Learning Curve | 2-3 weeks | 1-2 weeks |
| User Interface | ⚠️ Functional but dated | ✅ Modern and clean |
Pros & Cons
Wrike
Pros
- ✅ Best-in-class resource management
- ✅ Advanced cross-project reporting
- ✅ Built-in proofing and approval workflows
- ✅ Native time tracking
- ✅ Excellent for agencies and PMOs
- ✅ Highly customizable dashboards
Cons
- ❌ Steeper learning curve (2-3 weeks)
- ❌ Interface feels dated compared to Asana
- ❌ User minimums on paid plans (2-5 users)
- ❌ Can feel overwhelming for small teams
- ❌ More expensive at higher tiers
Asana
Pros
- ✅ Cleaner, more modern interface
- ✅ Faster learning curve (1-2 weeks)
- ✅ Free plan supports up to 15 users
- ✅ Better mobile app experience
- ✅ Strong automation capabilities
- ✅ No user minimums on paid plans
Cons
- ❌ Weaker resource management vs Wrike
- ❌ No built-in time tracking
- ❌ No native proofing workflows
- ❌ Workload features only on Advanced plan
- ❌ Less suitable for complex agencies
Best Use Cases
Choose Wrike If...
- ✅ You're a large enterprise (200+ people) with complex resource needs
- ✅ You need advanced workload management and capacity planning
- ✅ You run a creative agency requiring proofing workflows
- ✅ You bill clients by the hour and need time tracking
- ✅ You manage 50+ concurrent projects and need cross-project visibility
- ✅ Your PMO requires detailed portfolio reporting
Choose Asana If...
- ✅ You're a mid-sized company (10-100 people) scaling operations
- ✅ You want powerful PM features without enterprise complexity
- ✅ Team adoption and ease of use are priorities
- ✅ You need multiple views but not advanced resource management
- ✅ You want faster onboarding (1-2 weeks vs 2-3 weeks)
- ✅ You're a product team, marketing team, or operations department
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Wrike better than Asana?
Wrike is better for large enterprises (200+ people) needing advanced resource management, workload balancing, and cross-project reporting. It's the superior choice for agencies, PMOs, and professional services firms. Asana is better for mid-sized teams (10-100 people) wanting powerful project management with easier onboarding. Choose Wrike for enterprise complexity, Asana for balanced power and usability.
Is Wrike more expensive than Asana?
Pricing is similar. Wrike Professional costs $9.80/user/month vs Asana Starter at $10.99/user/month. However, Wrike requires 2-user minimums ($19.60/month minimum) while Asana has no minimums. At enterprise tiers, both cost around $24-25/user/month. For small teams, Asana's free plan (15 users) is more generous than Wrike's (5 users).
Can Asana replace Wrike?
Asana can replace Wrike for most teams under 100 people. You get multiple views, dependencies, portfolios, and automation. However, if you rely on Wrike's advanced resource management, workload charts, or built-in proofing, Asana falls short. Large enterprises (200+ people) and agencies billing by the hour typically need Wrike's depth.
Which is better for creative teams?
Wrike is significantly better for creative teams and agencies. Built-in proofing lets you annotate designs, videos, and documents directly in the platform. Track approval stages and maintain version history. Asana requires third-party integrations like Frame.io or Filestage for comparable workflows.
Can I migrate from Wrike to Asana?
Yes. Both platforms support CSV export/import for basic data transfer. However, custom fields, automations, and dashboards require manual reconfiguration. Plan for 2-4 weeks of migration time depending on complexity. Asana offers migration consulting for enterprise customers.
Which has better reporting?
Wrike has more powerful reporting with fully customizable dashboards and cross-project analytics. You can pull data from multiple projects, folders, and spaces into unified reports. Asana's Portfolios and reporting are good but less customizable. For PMO leaders needing detailed analytics, Wrike wins this category.
Final Recommendation
Best for Most Teams: Asana
For the majority of teams (10-100 people), Asana offers the best balance of power and usability. You get multiple views, dependencies, portfolios, and automation without Wrike's enterprise complexity. The cleaner interface and faster learning curve (1-2 weeks) mean higher team adoption. At $10.99/user/month, pricing is competitive with better free plan limits.
Best for:
- Mid-sized companies (10-100 people) scaling operations
- Product teams, marketing teams, operations departments
- Teams prioritizing ease of use and adoption
- Companies not requiring advanced resource management
Best for Enterprises: Wrike
Large enterprises (200+ people), agencies, and PMOs should choose Wrike. The advanced resource management, workload balancing, cross-project dashboards, and built-in proofing justify the learning curve. If you bill by the hour or manage complex resource allocation across 50+ projects, Wrike's depth is essential.
Best for:
- Large enterprises (200+ people) with complex needs
- Creative agencies requiring proofing workflows
- PMOs managing 50+ concurrent projects
- Professional services firms billing by the hour
Quick Decision Framework
Team size under 100? Choose Asana for better UX and faster adoption
Enterprise (200+ people)? Choose Wrike for advanced resource management
Need proofing workflows? Wrike has built-in creative proofing; Asana requires integrations
Our Recommendation: Match Tool to Team Size
The deciding factor is team size and complexity. Under 100 people? Start with Asana's free plan and upgrade as needed. Over 200 people or running an agency? Invest in Wrike for resource management depth. Both offer free trials - test with real projects before committing.